zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. stavro+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-10-20 23:41:00
How is Google Drive "way more secure" than a peer-to-peer encrypted solution?
replies(1): >>AStone+C
◧
2. AStone+C[view] [source] 2024-10-20 23:50:57
>>stavro+(OP)
Most of us do not have IDS/IPS/DLP tooling in our home networks, nor do we have a 24/7 on-call SOC team monitoring their SIEMs dashboards.

Google and Microsoft provision this stuff, even for consumers, with secure authentication and good protections.

replies(2): >>stavro+m2 >>Evidlo+ax
◧◩
3. stavro+m2[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-10-21 00:16:28
>>AStone+C
Syncthing is peer to peer, the files are already on the device. There's no way requiring one more device to be secure (the server) is better than not requiring it.
◧◩
4. Evidlo+ax[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-10-21 07:15:29
>>AStone+C
It uses STUN/TURN so your first point is irrelevant.

I don't understand the second. Are you saying Syncthing is less secure?

[go to top]