zlacker

[parent] [thread] 0 comments
1. rhelz+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-10-19 19:21:10
Great point. They even did a bad job of reading the title. The title wasn't "Language is not essential for thought", the title was "Language is not essential for the cognitive processes *underlying* thought."

We'd better hope that is true, because if we didn't have non-linguistic mastery of the cognitive processes underlying thought it's hard to see how we could even acquire language in the first place.

[go to top]