zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. knubie+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-10-14 16:17:21
Why not rama/defop and rama/defn?
replies(1): >>nathan+32
2. nathan+32[view] [source] 2024-10-14 16:31:48
>>knubie+(OP)
That would make it so you can't do "use" on com.rpl.rama. Since Rama is a full language, doing a "use" on the namespace is generally preferred as otherwise you would have to write "rama/" everywhere, which is irritating.

I also don't like overloading "defn" with something that's completely different. Also, a deframafn is more than a Clojure defn since it can emit to other output streams.

[go to top]