zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. neorom+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-10-10 21:32:07
And we would care because...?
replies(1): >>ashirv+X2
◧
2. ashirv+X2[view] [source] 2024-10-10 21:54:48
>>neorom+(OP)
Because they were mentioned twice..?
replies(1): >>neorom+No1
◧◩
3. neorom+No1[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-10-11 13:10:46
>>ashirv+X2
If they insist on using a pseudonym it is their right, going out of your way to unmask pseudonyms is scummy(akin to doxxing).
[go to top]