zlacker

People tend to care about the games, and buy whatever platform those games run on, not the other way around.

>>mgauna+(OP)
Ad avoidance is a good solution to caring about the games. You can't covet the product if you don't even know it exists. With Nintendo games in particular, it helps that Nintendo is the kind of asshole corporation that copyright strikes third parties showing off their games online. That makes it even easier to not know what their games are.

>>mgauna+(OP)
I don't really know how prevalent the phenomenon is nowadays, but there have been "fanboys" for specific console manufacturers for decades now. Even "console wars". In any case, it seems now most people play on PC, barring--yuck--mobile phones.

>>lupusr+Ai1
Nintendo doesn't necessarily need advertising, because their franchises are so strong. I think people know there's gonna be a new Mario Party, or new Mario Kart, or new 3D Mario game, and they'll buy them if they like those games. Odds are if you like Mario Party 8 then Superstars will be right up your alley.

Nintendo also has the somewhat unique position of being the only one providing high-quality games in a variety of categories. If you want a couch racing game, you're playing nintendo. If you want a 3D platformer, you're playing nintendo. If you want a couch party games, you're playing nintendo. In fact if you want couch co-op at all you're playing nintendo, pretty much everyone else gave it up because you lose money.

>>Funes-+um1
the switch is also a popular platform because you can take it with you, and provides a better experience than a touch phone.

>>lupusr+Ai1
All game publishers are evil corporations.

There are a number of great studios which happen to have financial ties to a given publisher. If you like these studios you have no choice but to indirectly give money to the publisher in question.

One obvious example for Nintendo is Monolith Software.