zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. cyborg+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-09-28 06:23:09
I don't have a strong opinion in the matter, but the argument is that banning things don't automatically make them go away. Banning things that people want to do will make organized crime spring up around it, which is often worse. The idea is, by allowing it in some limited legal way, you make it unprofitable for the organized criminals.
replies(1): >>MavisB+cb
2. MavisB+cb[view] [source] 2024-09-28 09:08:55
>>cyborg+(OP)
Yeah and I think I believed in aspects of this line of logic when my state legalized sportsbooks. I believe in harm reduction in most regards. What happened though, in my opinion, is an increase in access wound up creating an increase in net harm. Just my assessment. Timing is worth noting, this was rolled out to users initially during quarantine times.
[go to top]