zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. diggin+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-09-27 16:02:04
My point was that drawing arbitrary lines for what's legal isn't the new invention you acted like it was.

This most recent comment has shifted the topic entirely, and I'm not going to address it because it's obviously either written in bad faith or just painfully unthoughtful.

replies(1): >>pjlega+m1
◧
2. pjlega+m1[view] [source] 2024-09-27 16:07:57
>>diggin+(OP)
The lines for what is legal are not at all drawn arbitrarily in a constitutional legal system such as the United States.
replies(1): >>unethi+nk
◧◩
3. unethi+nk[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-09-27 17:40:32
>>pjlega+m1
Counterpoint: Yes, they are, within the bounds of higher law.
[go to top]