zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. nemetr+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-09-27 09:58:06
It’s just an example.
replies(1): >>MavisB+r1
2. MavisB+r1[view] [source] 2024-09-27 10:09:07
>>nemetr+(OP)
That's fair, and I really don't fundamentally disagree with what they said I just wanted to add some cultural context here. Will plead ignorance that my experience working on issues of "addiction" or compulsions outside of the U.S. is incredibly thin but, knowing how compulsion tends to play out stateside- these are my observations. I'm genuinely concerned considering how poorly we've done treating those with substance use disorder, which I think is arguably simpler than gambling addiction in some respects
replies(1): >>nemetr+t8
◧◩
3. nemetr+t8[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-09-27 11:01:07
>>MavisB+r1
I don't necessarily disagree, but the original comment didn't suggest that gambling and cannabis are equally harmful, or even that cannabis is harmful. The point was that policymaking seems to tend toward all-or-nothing (either fully prohibited, or anything goes), and the legalization of cannabis is a recent example of that. The goods or harms of cannabis are beside the point.
[go to top]