zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. Wolfen+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-09-17 04:04:56
Sure, but a lot of people are besides brain-dead slop-consumers.

That doesn't really challenge the proposal about regulating content.

(I personally recoil at the proposition of China-like content moderation but whatever.)

replies(1): >>throwa+lw1
2. throwa+lw1[view] [source] 2024-09-17 16:59:43
>>Wolfen+(OP)
Algorithm moderation is not content moderation. A recent court case found that algorithmic recommendations don't fall under section 230 protection.
[go to top]