zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. dylan6+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-09-16 14:55:35
I've never looked at the market place terms vendors agree to, but I can imagine return claw backs are a thing. Very similar to credit card merchant agreements for charge backs. A very lax return policy on Amazon doesn't have to be expensive to Amazon.
replies(1): >>jdiez1+Z4
2. jdiez1+Z4[view] [source] 2024-09-16 15:28:13
>>dylan6+(OP)
I'm not just talking about money. They can set whatever terms they like with vendors because selling on Amazon is a very attractive business for independent dropshippers etc.
replies(1): >>dylan6+d5
◧◩
3. dylan6+d5[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-09-16 15:29:54
>>jdiez1+Z4
How about you describe what your thinking here is, because as of now all your doing is trying to counter my comments by saying "no". You're adding nothing to why you think the moat exists and no other online vendor can compete with it.
replies(1): >>jdiez1+T5
◧◩◪
4. jdiez1+T5[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-09-16 15:33:20
>>dylan6+d5
I don't have the inclination to hunt for evidence for you. I'm not saying other companies can't do it. But it will be hard because of the capital/scaling/network effect requirements that Amazon has today.

This is my opinion and I'm not trying to convince you of it. Have a nice day.

[go to top]