zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. baxtr+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-09-15 20:27:29
Are we sure this got “leaked”? Or is this merely part of the not leaked production PDF?

It will generate a ton of attention. Who cares if it’s bad?

replies(3): >>simonw+21 >>latexr+we >>mewse-+hp2
2. simonw+21[view] [source] 2024-09-15 20:36:41
>>baxtr+(OP)
As far as I can tell this was leaked to a person who’s been having a high profile disagreement with MrBeast, by either a current or former staff member.

Maybe it’s a fake or a deliberate release, but it doesn’t read like the at to me. There is a ton of commercially sensitive information in here. Not to mention that note about the expensive squid game incident which I doubt they would have included in a document for public consumption.

I don’t think MrBeast needs to farm for attention outside of his current very successful video tactics.

replies(1): >>ants_e+Pe
3. latexr+we[view] [source] 2024-09-15 22:29:09
>>baxtr+(OP)
Mr Beast’s company has been getting a ton of negative attention for how it works and how it treats employees and contestants. It seems plausible it was leaked as another example of toxic culture.
◧◩
4. ants_e+Pe[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-09-15 22:32:43
>>simonw+21
> I don’t think MrBeast needs to farm for attention outside of his current very successful video tactics.

Well he is in the middle of a PR push responding to the claims from former employees that he fakes his videos and is generally fraudulent

5. mewse-+hp2[view] [source] 2024-09-16 19:02:57
>>baxtr+(OP)
It was leaked with a lot of attention being paid to the "no doesn't necessarily mean no" section in the context of abuse at the MrBeast org
[go to top]