zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. alsetm+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-09-13 15:53:03
> Sounds like credit card fraud to me. Bots using stolen cards to scrape OF content. Also easily verifies that the number works before attempting a pricier purchase.

I’ve subscribed for one month to two different creators just to check the content. Neither was interesting enough to maintain a subscription. I don’t think the described behavior sounds nefarious.

replies(1): >>taikob+b2
◧
2. taikob+b2[view] [source] 2024-09-13 16:06:42
>>alsetm+(OP)
The part that they delete their account immediately afterwards?
replies(3): >>paulry+p5 >>aqme28+Ob >>rockin+Hh
◧◩
3. paulry+p5[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-09-13 16:26:12
>>taikob+b2
Perhaps to avoid unintended rebill or make it less likely for a loved one to discover it.
◧◩
4. aqme28+Ob[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-09-13 17:09:13
>>taikob+b2
Buyers remorse after purchasing pornography? I don't know why you're surprised.
replies(2): >>yamaza+ii >>luckyl+jl
◧◩
5. rockin+Hh[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-09-13 17:50:08
>>taikob+b2
Probably a combination of being a subscription model with auto-renewal and people regretting wasting money for this type of content.
◧◩◪
6. yamaza+ii[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-09-13 17:56:06
>>aqme28+Ob
Or regular embarrassment, or I don't want to "get in" to onlyfans, just this one time then I'll delete.
◧◩◪
7. luckyl+jl[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-09-13 18:16:37
>>aqme28+Ob
I suppose that hinges on what "a lot" means in that comment. If it's "a lot" in absolute values, that's very plausible. If it's "a lot" as a percentage, OnlyFans would have to have a high rate of account closures.
replies(1): >>qingch+FM
◧◩◪◨
8. qingch+FM[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-09-13 21:33:03
>>luckyl+jl
OK, I asked. "A lot" is about 20%.
[go to top]