zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. michae+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-09-13 15:29:34
Revenue per employee isn't a useful metric here IMHO.

If Company A sells $100M of televisions which they imported for $95M they've made $5M in profit.

If Company B sells $100M of search ads which they served for $1M they've made $99M in profit.

From a revenue perspective they're equal - but $1M invested in Company A produces a 5% return on investment, while the same $1M invested in Company B has a 9900% ROI.

replies(1): >>finnh+p
2. finnh+p[view] [source] 2024-09-13 15:33:00
>>michae+(OP)
The quoted section is about net revenue, which in this article means total revenue minus the payouts to creators. In other worse, revenue minus COGS. It's a valid comparison.
replies(1): >>michae+1d
◧◩
3. michae+1d[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-09-13 16:49:59
>>finnh+p
Ah, you're right. I confused the quoted section with the second paragraph and first two charts of the article, which are throwing around billions and comparing to the NBA based on gross revenue.
[go to top]