zlacker

None of these commenters actually use OnlyFans, because there's literally a free tier option to subscribe. You still need a credit card to sign up because they obviously want to reduce the friction for subscribing or paying for extra content. I've seen a lot of models that will use Twitter > Free OF > Paid OF funnel. Twitter is mostly soft-core / flirty, Free OF has some nudity, typically no videos, and the Paid OF is where most of explicit content is.

Revenue wise, you'll make a lot more money tailoring content to a small group of users who will pay for custom content / live cams etc than having any mass appeal with small donations. The large social media funnel is mostly there to get model's content out there to find the whales.

Context: I have a side business deploying chat LLMs for OnlyFans models for fans to "talk" to that's currently at 65k/MRR. It definitely helps with user retention, as models who chat to their fans will have a 2x or 3x spend rate per fan.

>>GaryNu+(OP)
> Context: I have a side business deploying chat LLMs for OnlyFans models for fans to "talk" to that's currently at 65k/MRR.

good job

>>greeni+i7
This is hackernews after all!

>>GaryNu+(OP)
> Context: I have a side business deploying chat LLMs for OnlyFans models for fans to "talk" to

How did you market this? Do you have a website for it?

>>licnep+ye
No website or advertising. All word of mouth / cold emailing.

>>GaryNu+(OP)
> Context: I have a side business deploying chat LLMs for OnlyFans models for fans to "talk" to

Seems illegal, or at the very least a violation of OF's Terms of Service.

>>zephyr+wj
Their ToS doesn't apply to off site content

>>GaryNu+1c
would be hilarious if you were THE gary numan. why tf you making SaaS income? i would not be anywhere near tech if my art was successful.

>>greeni+Wy
I'm just a fan, although Gary is still making great music!