zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. dachwo+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-09-13 09:22:26
Being a digital pimp is just as morally disgusting as being an irl pimp.
replies(3): >>GaryNu+X6 >>Whompi+Gx >>standa+Nz
◧
2. GaryNu+X6[view] [source] 2024-09-13 10:47:19
>>dachwo+(OP)
This is the free market, check your moral reservations at the door.
replies(1): >>arando+yz
◧
3. Whompi+Gx[view] [source] 2024-09-13 14:28:43
>>dachwo+(OP)
Let's investigate that claim. Does OF physically and emotionally abuse its creators? Does it perpetuate human trafficking? Does OF create drug addiction and use that to control its creators? Does OF force its creators to have sexual contact with potentially violent or diseased/depraved individuals?

Ask yourself, would you prefer your family members to be under an IRL pimp or run their own OF?

If you look at this realistically, OF is not nearly as morally reprehensible as an IRL pimp.

◧◩
4. arando+yz[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-09-13 14:42:19
>>GaryNu+X6
So you would have no reservations about a business selling class A drugs to kids? Free market after all.
replies(1): >>itsokt+8D
◧
5. standa+Nz[view] [source] 2024-09-13 14:43:55
>>dachwo+(OP)
Which is to say, not disgusting at all.
◧◩◪
6. itsokt+8D[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-09-13 15:06:24
>>arando+yz
Yes, selling drugs to kids and being a "content creator" on OnlyFans are the same thing.
replies(1): >>arando+Tj1
◧◩◪◨
7. arando+Tj1[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-09-13 19:56:48
>>itsokt+8D
In an untethered free market, how are they different?
[go to top]