zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. SoftTa+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-08-27 20:17:47
What if they had shown you pictures of men whose penises were obviously showing through their pants? Why was Facebook not being gender-neutral with this tactic?
replies(3): >>Fatnin+qc >>numpad+vo1 >>pjc50+AV1
2. Fatnin+qc[view] [source] 2024-08-27 21:25:54
>>SoftTa+(OP)
Because fb knows the user is male and odds are this would attract a click.
replies(2): >>SoftTa+sd >>LightB+yt
◧◩
3. SoftTa+sd[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-27 21:32:14
>>Fatnin+qc
True. They probably know if you're gay also, so in that case they might do it.
◧◩
4. LightB+yt[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-27 23:18:08
>>Fatnin+qc
click looks remarkably like dick when set in this context.
5. numpad+vo1[view] [source] 2024-08-28 10:04:35
>>SoftTa+(OP)
This is generally because softcore pornography for women do not concern penises. Women seem to prefer exposed male chests.
6. pjc50+AV1[view] [source] 2024-08-28 14:26:35
>>SoftTa+(OP)
At one point people were playing a game with the Tumblr terms of service, which explicitly banned "female presenting nipples". Subjective standards of offence always result in ridiculous cases.
[go to top]