zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. abraae+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-08-27 19:12:01
As a (just) boomer, I'd be in favor of having the voting age lowered to 16. Certainly there are many reckless, feckless and uninformed 16 year olds, but the standard of debate coming from the seniors in the room is horrifying and needs to be diluted by the people who have the biggest stake in our planet's future.
replies(2): >>louthy+Fg >>nirav7+ws
2. louthy+Fg[view] [source] 2024-08-27 20:34:10
>>abraae+(OP)
This is happening in the UK. It was in Labour’s manifesto (and they were recently elected)
3. nirav7+ws[view] [source] 2024-08-27 21:41:05
>>abraae+(OP)
Why would lowering to 16 from 18 make a difference? Plenty of data out there shows that age demographic is the least likely to show up on election day and vote.
replies(2): >>abraae+UJ >>generj+am1
◧◩
4. abraae+UJ[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-27 23:42:13
>>nirav7+ws
Perhaps then the ones that did take the trouble to vote would be well informed and thoughtful.
◧◩
5. generj+am1[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-28 07:16:36
>>nirav7+ws
There is some evidence getting people to vote earlier results in them being more consistent voters over time. And they would potentially be fresh off a civics class.
replies(1): >>nirav7+nr6
◧◩◪
6. nirav7+nr6[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-29 23:27:42
>>generj+am1
That's interesting. I'll have to dig into this.
[go to top]