zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. EasyMa+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-08-27 14:59:22
They still control it, and it’s still their right as a corporation. I’m asking where is it wrong or in the US Constitution that says a company has to allow all points of view? That’s a moral call, and I can see people arguing that, but it is not illegal or amoral from the point of the company or those who say free speech/property rights apply to all
replies(1): >>mike_h+hf
2. mike_h+hf[view] [source] 2024-08-27 16:20:16
>>EasyMa+(OP)
Is anyone claiming it's illegal or that the constitution demands that?
[go to top]