zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. lupusr+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-08-27 13:40:06
HN, to it's credit, at least permitted dissent without systematic bans for going against whatever was the officially blessed narrative of the day.
replies(2): >>firest+G6 >>idunno+L51
◧
2. firest+G6[view] [source] 2024-08-27 14:18:35
>>lupusr+(OP)
It does however downvotes start to gray out comments and HN is still prone to brigading.
replies(1): >>3np+6t1
◧
3. idunno+L51[view] [source] 2024-08-27 19:10:27
>>lupusr+(OP)
How would you know that? My account was banned.
replies(1): >>lupusr+ir1
◧◩
4. lupusr+ir1[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-27 20:57:29
>>idunno+L51
I dissented regularly and vehemently and was not banned on HN.
◧◩
5. 3np+6t1[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-27 21:07:06
>>firest+G6
I don't see how that points to presence of systematic bans.
replies(1): >>firest+wG2
◧◩◪
6. firest+wG2[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-28 09:39:51
>>3np+6t1
I didn’t say anything about bans.
[go to top]