zlacker

I think the original point was that this wasn't late. It was timed to be influential to the outcome of the election.

>>ericjm+(OP)
Which also casts doubt on its sincerity.

>>ericjm+(OP)
I think it was timed to be relevant. Doubt this will influence the outcome of the election, esp given the WH statement which seems to be in agreement.

>>ErikBj+V4
As far as I'm concerned he typed it out right after the events and scheduled it to be released later, that is now.

>>loa_in+09
The letter was a response to the House Judiciary Committee, it didn't from nowhere.

>>ericjm+(OP)
It's relevant right now because there's recent increase in the amount of government-directed censorship and propaganda on the social media platforms at the moment. Take a look at Reddit. Look at what's happening in the UK or with the EU threatening to imprison Musk for allowing Trump to be interviewed.

>>indoor+oN
> or with the EU threatening to imprison Musk for allowing Trump to be interviewed.

?

>>TMWNN+cw1
https://thehill.com/policy/technology/4824438-eu-sends-warni...

>>indoor+OA1
Holy cow. I'd heard something about the EU recently warning Musk over Twitter, but did not know that it was because of the heinous mortal sin of interviewing the former and possible next US president.

>>TMWNN+ND1
Yes, God forbid that a billionaire follows the laws of a country or union of countries.