zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. ccorco+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-08-24 23:05:26
Now we just need a healthy SQL transpiler ecosystem so we can all live in the future!
replies(2): >>ec1096+Vp >>r1b+5n1
2. ec1096+Vp[view] [source] 2024-08-25 03:42:00
>>ccorco+(OP)
Yes, and to try new features to see if they gain traction before standardization.
3. r1b+5n1[view] [source] 2024-08-25 15:12:50
>>ccorco+(OP)
This was my first thought as well. I like the language, but I’m hesitant to adopt it without tooling that can extract an AST, ideally interoperable with the hard-won tooling we already have for SQL.

Improved UX at query development time is nice, but data teams need so much more than this. Stuff like lineage, linting, cross-dialect interop - these are no longer niche concerns, they are table stakes, and they come from having a shared syntax for data transformation.

[go to top]