zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. dogsle+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-08-14 15:11:21
That it didn't exist is not really that relvant. I.e. the US classified secrecy as a munition so under the US' framing it is a 2nd amendment right necessary to balance power between people and government.. Take it away from all and it is no longer essential.
replies(2): >>some_r+e9 >>xhkkff+uc
2. some_r+e9[view] [source] 2024-08-14 16:04:03
>>dogsle+(OP)
Has this framing ever actually been tested in court? Between the dramatic re-interpretation of the 2nd as a collective non-right and the precedent of laws like ITAR and other munitions controls I can't imagine this would hold up.
replies(1): >>armini+Qc
3. xhkkff+uc[view] [source] 2024-08-14 16:20:13
>>dogsle+(OP)
Has anyone used the 3rd amendment to argue against the government forcing them to include backdoors and surveillance mechanisms?
◧◩
4. armini+Qc[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-14 16:21:48
>>some_r+e9
Remember the 90s cryptowars and the "illegal shirts with math on them"?
replies(1): >>some_r+Cr
◧◩◪
5. some_r+Cr[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-08-14 17:54:19
>>armini+Qc
Yeah that was largely about export controls vs freedom of speech, I don't know of any actual court case involving the second amendment a la https://xkcd.com/504/
[go to top]