zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. estoma+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-07-02 08:26:53
> There is absolutely no reason for the majority of software jobs to not be fully remote in 2024

Except a lot of people enjoy coming into the office, of course.

replies(1): >>angora+Fl
2. angora+Fl[view] [source] 2024-07-02 12:29:04
>>estoma+(OP)
I’d maybe ask what “a lot” means, because I haven’t worked with too many people who enjoy it. But regardless, when I say a job should be fully remote, I just mean it should be able/permitted to be done 100% remotely. If someone wants to do that job from the office, that’s OK too.
replies(1): >>estoma+rs
◧◩
3. estoma+rs[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-07-02 13:22:51
>>angora+Fl
You should according to... well, yourself. But for teams who are co-located and meet up in the office 1-2 days a week, your never being around physically might be a distraction. We're not all the same.
replies(1): >>angora+MN
◧◩◪
4. angora+MN[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-07-02 15:40:01
>>estoma+rs
In your scenario, what is it about me not being physically present in person, that would constitute a distraction? Please cite sources/data for any claims you make.

edit: Also, if the answer is that the company is just not prepared with the infrastructure & culture needed to support fully-remote developers, they are closing themselves off to approximately 40% of the available talent pool, not to mention a disproportionate number of minorities and women[0]. This should constitute an emergency that must be corrected immediately in the mind of any competent CTO or engineering leader.

[0] https://www.techtarget.com/searchhrsoftware/news/365531979/N...

replies(1): >>estoma+4r2
◧◩◪◨
5. estoma+4r2[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-07-03 08:41:21
>>angora+MN
Yeah pal I'm not gonna cite a source to tell you about my own experiences, lol.

You fucking HN-parody.

replies(1): >>angora+8I2
◧◩◪◨⬒
6. angora+8I2[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-07-03 11:49:08
>>estoma+4r2
I apologize if asking for data hurts your feelings, and you’re obviously welcome to share your experiences as well (I did in a parent comment above).

The reason I asked for sources is that there seem to be a lot of experiences/anecdotes on both sides of this issue, but so far I haven’t been able to find too much research that supports the idea that working in person is beneficial to overall productivity, or to the company culture, or to any other company-wide metric that would justify having a mandate that all employees must work in person. If that data exists I’d like to see it, so that I can decide whether it’s worth changing my own position on this issue.

[go to top]