zlacker

[parent] [thread] 9 comments
1. jbaber+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-06-29 00:19:17
Someone else told me they thought lynx came first. Is that really true? I thought images were there from the beginning.
replies(5): >>robter+a1 >>dboreh+ta >>fsckbo+Ng >>1vuio0+eh >>jbaber+jC6
2. robter+a1[view] [source] 2024-06-29 00:32:42
>>jbaber+(OP)
Lynx wasn't first:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WorldWideWeb

replies(1): >>asveik+nd
3. dboreh+ta[view] [source] 2024-06-29 02:23:50
>>jbaber+(OP)
Lynx wasn't first, but images weren't there from the beginning either. At least, not inline images.
replies(1): >>banana+QT1
◧◩
4. asveik+nd[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-06-29 03:12:30
>>robter+a1
Not first but the initial release was 2 years before Netscape was founded, and 1 year before Mosaic. It was definitely an early browser.

I first used lynx years later when I was getting into Linux in the late 90s, and I found that part surprising at the time.

5. fsckbo+Ng[view] [source] 2024-06-29 04:07:41
>>jbaber+(OP)
lynx's goal was running in-terminal/cli, not "full web, because web has no images". HTML was also designed to allow unknown tags to be ignored. back in those days I ran mosaic and netscape with image download off by default to speed navigation up.
6. 1vuio0+eh[view] [source] 2024-06-29 04:18:57
>>jbaber+(OP)
The second web browser came in 1992. Unlike the first one from 1990 that was written in "Objective C" for _only_ NeXT computers (thanks to Steve Jobs BS), this one was written in C and thus portable to multiple operating systems and multiple architectures. It was distributed with a library, libwww, and at least thirty(!) simple, example programs illustrating how to use the library to write programs to access websites.

IMHO, it puts to shame the bloated, non-portable, overly-complicated, advertising-sponsored crap that is distrubuted today.

https://www.w3.org/Library/Distribution/w3c-libwww-5.4.2.tgz

30 small example programs written in C plus documentation for every one. Good luck finding something like that today.

replies(1): >>1vuio0+vK1
◧◩
7. 1vuio0+vK1[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-06-29 21:40:22
>>1vuio0+eh
https://www.w3.org/History.html

Line mode still works great. Text-only.

◧◩
8. banana+QT1[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-06-29 23:41:24
>>dboreh+ta
That’s right. Tim Berbers-Lee mentions that here https://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/WorldWideWeb.html
replies(1): >>dboreh+032
◧◩◪
9. dboreh+032[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-06-30 02:09:33
>>banana+QT1
Heh, well yes since I was using these products at the time and haven't quite gone senile yet :) Almost nobody seems to remember Cello which was browser du jour for me, for about a jour.
10. jbaber+jC6[view] [source] 2024-07-02 00:08:49
>>jbaber+(OP)
Okay:

- Lynx is far older than I thought. - WorldWideWeb 1.0 understood images, but didn't inline them, which is really what my creaky memory meant when it thought images were there from the beginning.

[go to top]