zlacker

Businesses are unable to plan around seasonality? What's up with that? In the US, businesses in touristy areas often will shut down for the slow season.

>>dnissl+(OP)
It's difficult to make work economically, other than shuttering for part of the year.

Which is why tourist resort towns and stadium areas tend to have a lot of closed shops when they're not "on".

Which in turn makes them less attractive for year-round residents, which spirals into intensifying seasonality.

>>ethbr1+p
When I think of places dominated by tourism its not the tourism that did it. Its that the tourism is what is left after little other job growth in any other sector after whatever impetus that triggered building the town in the first places ceased to exist.

>>kjkjad+g6
My personal example would be the old Turner Field in Atlanta.

Major sports team, but the area was a wasteland, because everything was developed around the 50,000 people flooding in for one afternoon. Parking lots, traffic flow, food stands.

The actual neighborhood was pretty dead.

Braves move up to a new stadium in Cobb county, some redevelopment, and now the old neighborhood is flourishing.

Saw the same as a (briefly) Florida resident.

I think it's difficult to establish "normal" development in an area subject to tourism tides, because many of the decisions are mutually exclusive.

Either {support tourism} or {support long term residential development}. And money intersects with politics, so eventually one set of interests win out.

>>dnissl+(OP)
Huge difference between a local business supporting daily needs versus a tourist focused business. Not to mention different infrastructure.

>>ethbr1+ba
Atlanta is a diversified economy though. When I think tourist dominated I think tourism is the main industry. Places like in the Caribbean that had to turn to that industry after the economics of whatever former niche cash crop the imperialists grew was obviated due to globalism.