zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. can163+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-23 13:14:32
If Right to Publicity laws indeed favor Scarlet here, then the law is really outdated and needs to catch up with the current paradigm.

A company wanted a voice, had something in their minds, approached a voice actor who has a similar voice to what they have in mind, got rejected, then approached next candidate and worked with her. Simple as that. If this is illegal, I don't know what is legal.

replies(1): >>GaggiX+11
◧
2. GaggiX+11[view] [source] 2024-05-23 13:20:06
>>can163+(OP)
OpenAi had been working with the "Sky" voice actress for months before first contacting Scarlett Johansson.
replies(2): >>flutas+w7 >>CRConr+zU8
◧◩
3. flutas+w7[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-23 13:54:23
>>GaggiX+11
And one of the co-founders of OpenAI (Karpathy) also quite literally said "The killer app of LLMs is Scarlett Johansson." the day after the announcement.

https://x.com/karpathy/status/1790373216537502106

replies(1): >>GaggiX+ga
◧◩◪
4. GaggiX+ga[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-23 14:06:36
>>flutas+w7
He wouldn't be the only person to want Scarlett Johansson voice inside ChatGPT, I read several comments wanting that (I guess "Sky" voice doesn't sound so similar after all), btw Karpathy doesn't really work for OpenAI anymore.
replies(1): >>CRConr+EU8
◧◩
5. CRConr+zU8[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-27 07:37:55
>>GaggiX+11
According to this cherry-picked article.
◧◩◪◨
6. CRConr+EU8[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-27 07:39:05
>>GaggiX+ga
> btw Karpathy doesn't really work for OpenAI anymore.

You say that as if it would give him less credibility.

In reality, it is of course the exact other way around.

[go to top]