zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. naaski+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-23 12:58:59
> This case is not a conspiracy theory. But it is something where you disagree with a popular opinion

Is it a popular opinion? Where's the evidence of that? Or is it maybe just a manufactured clickbait outrage now bordering on conspiracy theory? I provided a link that clearly demonstrates the very foundational claim is wrong, and the article has already clarified the mistakes in the timeline that conspiracists are citing as evidence of malfeasance. This controversy is a textbook nothing burger and it annoys me to no end that people keep falling for these tactics.

replies(1): >>latexr+N1
2. latexr+N1[view] [source] 2024-05-23 13:11:01
>>naaski+(OP)
I already said I didn’t think it was worth continuing the conversation, so I hope I don’t regret trying to be kind.

> Is it a popular opinion or is it manufactured clickbait outrage now bordering on conspiracy theory?

Please realise that calling something “manufactured clickbait outrage” itself borders on conspiracy theory. Again, empathise, look at your argument with an outside eye.

> it annoys me to no end

Don’t let it. Being annoyed on the internet only ruins your day. And the more unhinged you become, the less sense your arguments will make and the more it will backfire.

Unless you have a personal relationship with either Altman or Johansson, I recommend you let this one go. It’s not worth the cost of any mental wellness. Some issues are, but not this one. Save yourself for the issues that are important.

Again I wish you a relaxing weekend.

[go to top]