zlacker

> > The article claims that: [...]

> > 3. The actress's natural voice sounds identical to the AI-generated Sky voice

> No it doesn't.

That's a verbatim quote from the article (albeit based on brief recordings).

I haven't heard the anonymous voice actress's voice myself to corroborate WP's claim, but (unless there's information I'm unaware of) neither have you to claim the opposite.

>>Ukv+(OP)
> That's a verbatim quote from the article

The clips are all online for you to listen to them yourself. The article can say what it likes, it's just wrong.

>>naaski+v1
Here, a direct comparison:

https://x.com/chriswiles87/status/1792909936189378653

>>naaski+v1
Just to make sure: have you correctly understood the article's claim?

It's saying that the anonymous voice actress's natural voice sounds identical to the AI-generated Sky voice (which implies it has not been altered by OpenAI to sound more like SJ, nor that they had her do some impression beyond her own natural voice).

If so, could you link the clips of the voice actress's natural voice, to compare to the AI version? I've searched but was unable to find such clips.

>>Ukv+L8
The AI voice is what’s in question here and there are plenty of examples, just listen to ones that aren’t intentionally selected to try to create the impression of similarity. Sky has been around for half a year so you don’t have to limit yourself to the tech demo but even if you do if you listen to the whole thing you’ll see the normal speaking voice is very different from ScarJo.

>>throwt+Pc
I know and agree. The article's claim is that the anonymous voice actress's natural voice sounds identical to the AI-generated Sky voice. That is, VA = AI, not AI = SJ or VA = SJ. Which corroborates with the claim that OpenAI was not asking her to do any particular impression.