zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. baxtr+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-23 09:41:56
The sad thing is: most probably absolutely nothing will happen.

These startups break laws, pay the fines and end up just fine.

Remember that it was Sam Altman who proposed to change the YC questionnaire to screen applicants by incidents where they have successfully broken rules. YC even boasts about that.

replies(5): >>varisp+h >>AvAn12+mg >>bko+9m >>onlyre+gm >>static+dv
2. varisp+h[view] [source] 2024-05-23 09:44:40
>>baxtr+(OP)
Or to rephrase it, the laws don't apply to the rich. They just have to pay a little bit more "tax" (which probably still works out to be less than typical small business has to pay % wise anyway) to be allowed to break them.
3. AvAn12+mg[view] [source] 2024-05-23 11:58:17
>>baxtr+(OP)
> These startups break laws, pay the fines and end up just fine.

That thought process puts them in the same boat as: Theranos, FTX, Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns, Countrywide Financial, Enron, Washington Mutual, Kidder Peabody, and many other companies which no longer exist.

So if (since?) they lack the ethical compass to not break the rules, perhaps a simple history of what happens to companies that do break the rules might be useful guidance...

4. bko+9m[view] [source] 2024-05-23 12:38:14
>>baxtr+(OP)
Do we really want someone's voice to be copyrightable, to a point where similar sounding people can't be used?

This is such a weird issue for HN to be upset about when other IP related issues (e.g. companies suing for recreating generic code, patent trolls, trademark colors, disregard of paywall, reverse engineering, etc), people here overwhelmingly fall on the side of weaker IP protections.

I guess the diff is some people just pick the side of "the little guy" and the example of centi millionaire beautiful actress vs billion dollar founder, the scales tip to the actress

5. onlyre+gm[view] [source] 2024-05-23 12:38:52
>>baxtr+(OP)
They're likely going to write Scarlett Johansson a large check and get a new voice.

What else do you think is going to happen?

The entire company gets shut down?

replies(1): >>tiahur+Go
◧◩
6. tiahur+Go[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-23 12:56:06
>>onlyre+gm
Why would it be a particularly large check? What are her damages?
7. static+dv[view] [source] 2024-05-23 13:34:25
>>baxtr+(OP)
Then you don’t know ScarJo. She doesn’t fuck around and she has enough money to put legal fees where her mouth is. She was the vanguard of actors suing for streaming royalties, for example.
[go to top]