zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. gambit+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-23 08:55:44
I don't understand why you are being sarcastic right now. Trademark cases are always decided on "if a person was shown this logo/song/whatever could they mistake it for the trademarked property of another company", not "well if you load it up in Paint you can see that some pixels around the edges are different so it's technically not the same logo your honour!".
replies(1): >>numpad+D
2. numpad+D[view] [source] 2024-05-23 09:03:25
>>gambit+(OP)
so... your position is now in favor of SJ? I don't see consistency in your comments other than that the aim is to downplay uniqueness of voice to justify OAI's actions after the fact.
replies(1): >>gambit+D2
◧◩
3. gambit+D2[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-23 09:21:24
>>numpad+D
No, my position hasn't changed - the average person on the street might think this voice sounds like SJ, but since SJ doesn't own exclusive rights to anyone else in the world sounding like her I don't think she has a legal ground to stand on, unless OpenAI pretended it is actually her. But I know for certain that the case will not be decided on spectographs of the voice.
[go to top]