zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. gr4vit+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-23 08:18:33
Not the person you replied to, but IMO it depends.

My reaction would never be "we must make it so people can't do deepfakes anymore". That would cause people to stop using it for positive/benign things as well. If someone is spreading deepfake porn of someone, and you could make the case that they are doing so in order to harm that person's reputation, then legal action would make sense, I think.

replies(1): >>CRConr+Bt9
2. CRConr+Bt9[view] [source] 2024-05-27 07:12:15
>>gr4vit+(OP)
> My reaction would never be "we must make it so people can't do deepfakes anymore". That would cause people to stop using it for positive/benign things as well.

Are there actually any "benign" uses for deepfakes?

replies(1): >>gr4vit+8Df
◧◩
3. gr4vit+8Df[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-29 13:56:38
>>CRConr+Bt9
Making videos of politicians doing goofy things. Say, Donald Trump scoring a goal in the UEFA Champions League. Or 'deepfakes' involving their pets doing something funny.
[go to top]