zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. dharma+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-23 07:28:58
Props for Scarlett for turning down what was likely a big chunk of change. I can see how being the official voice of AI could turn out to be counter productive for her in the longer run
replies(2): >>exo762+1c >>kamaal+qR2
◧
2. exo762+1c[view] [source] 2024-05-23 09:09:50
>>dharma+(OP)
What long run? She is 39 in Hollywood.
replies(1): >>dharma+Ls
◧◩
3. dharma+Ls[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-23 11:32:54
>>exo762+1c
I guess the $150m+ nw acts as a bit of a cushion/retirement nest egg. I mean longer run in terms of AI development - if it gets very polarised I’m not sure you want to be the poster girl
◧
4. kamaal+qR2[view] [source] 2024-05-24 03:46:18
>>dharma+(OP)
This is bigger than Will Smith turning the role of Neo for the Matrix movie.
[go to top]