zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. moogly+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-23 07:00:41
Technically? Maybe not. In spirit? Sure as heck.
replies(1): >>hacker+k3
2. hacker+k3[view] [source] 2024-05-23 07:30:20
>>moogly+(OP)
This could be confirmation bias.

Here's an alternative explanation that fits the same facts. Sam tweeted "her", not due to the voice, but due the existence of a conversational system that resembled the system in the movie. This primed people to hear Scarlett Johansson's voice in a generically cheerful female voice actor who was contracted over half a year ago. Scarlett's lawyers encourage her to write a public letter, helping Scarlett with the wording, in order to steer the public narrative, in order to place pressure on OpenAI to settle with her financially out of court.

replies(1): >>jamesp+7c
◧◩
3. jamesp+7c[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-23 08:41:58
>>hacker+k3
It's an alternative explanation all right
[go to top]