zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. tedivm+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-22 22:54:34
What Sam is saying is very different than what I'm saying. I'm saying he should be proactive and just do it, he's saying that if people explicitly reach out to him then he'll do it specifically for them.
replies(2): >>super2+h4 >>Symmet+iR1
◧
2. super2+h4[view] [source] 2024-05-22 23:16:37
>>tedivm+(OP)
Turkeys don't vote for an early Christmas.
replies(1): >>johnbe+tY1
◧
3. Symmet+iR1[view] [source] 2024-05-23 14:06:34
>>tedivm+(OP)
Importantly if he just said publicly that that he wouldn't enforce the non-disparagement agreements that could be legally binding[1]. But if he just says he'll release people who he's, legally speaking, free to just not do that.

[1] The keywords are promissory estoppel. I'm not a lawyer but this looks at least like a borderline case worth worrying about.

◧◩
4. johnbe+tY1[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-23 14:44:16
>>super2+h4
Bingo.
[go to top]