zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. mikepa+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-22 03:52:42
What if we take AI out of the equation. Should the voice actress who voiced Sky (call her A) be unable to do any voice work because she sounds too much like SJ?

How about if the production company that made "Her" wants to make "Her 2". SJ declines the voice work. Are they not allowed to hire A to do the voice work? They ask SJ again but she still declines. They make the movie with A. Was it bad form?

Just trying to figure out where people would draw the line.

replies(2): >>Gud+34 >>djur+Rc
2. Gud+34[view] [source] 2024-05-22 04:39:17
>>mikepa+(OP)
Why would we take A.I. out of the equation?

Presumably, the production company and Scarlet Johansson would have it in their contract what to do in case she doesn’t want to act in a sequel.

No contract exists between OpenAI and Scarlet Johansson.

3. djur+Rc[view] [source] 2024-05-22 06:33:25
>>mikepa+(OP)
The relevant case law concerns defendants who "use an imitation to convey the impression" that it's the actual person. Just having a voice that sounds like SJ is not a problem, but the "Her" tweet and the fact that they tried to get her on board complicates the issue, and if there's any paper trail that they intentionally chose a soundalike that might be trouble.

Actors don't work in films without detailed contracts, so the normal rules don't necessarily apply in that situation. The producers of Her might have the right to use SJ's likeness in related material. In any case, if they made another movie with a soundalike, the soundalike would be credited and not just called "A", so there would be no confusion about whose voice it was.

[go to top]