zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. ml-ano+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-21 07:02:05
It’s wild to me that there are people who think that OpenAI are the underdog. A 80Bn Microsoft vassal, what a plucky upstart.

You realise that there are multiple employees including the CEO publicly drawing direct comparisons to the movie Her after having tried and failed twice to hire the actress who starred in the movie? There is no non idiotic reading of this.

replies(1): >>XorNot+n4
2. XorNot+n4[view] [source] 2024-05-21 07:57:23
>>ml-ano+(OP)
You're reading my statements as defending OpenAI. Put on your "I'm the PR department hat" and figure out what you'd do if you were OpenAI given various permutations of the possible facts here.

That's what I'm discussing.

Edit: which is to say, I think Sam Altman may have been a god damn idiot about this, but it's also wild anyone thought that ScarJo or anyone in Hollywood would agree - AI is currently the hot button issue there and you'd find yourself the much more local target of their ire.

replies(1): >>ml-ano+qf
◧◩
3. ml-ano+qf[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-21 09:22:23
>>XorNot+n4
Then why bother mentioning an "underdog story" at all?

Who is the underdog in this situation? In your comment it seems like you're framing OpenAI as the underdog (or perceived underdog) which is just bonkers.

Hacker News isn't a hivemind and there are those of us who work in GenAI who are firmly on the side of the creatives and gasp even rights holders.

[go to top]