zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. visarg+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-21 03:37:27
> since it is not exactly identical voice, or even not that close, they can plausibly deny it

When studios approach an actress A and she refuses, then another actress B takes the role, is that infringing on A's rights? Or should they just scrap the movie?

Maybe if they replicated a scene from the A's movies or there was striking likeness between the voices... but not generally.

replies(1): >>nicce+oi
2. nicce+oi[view] [source] 2024-05-21 06:49:35
>>visarg+(OP)
> When studios approach an actress A and she refuses, then another actress B takes the role, is that infringing on A's rights? Or should they just scrap the movie?

The scenario would have been that they approach none.

replies(1): >>r2_pil+Hz2
◧◩
3. r2_pil+Hz2[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-21 20:50:17
>>nicce+oi
Your scenario leads to the disenfranchisement of lesser-known voice talent, since they cannot take on work that Top Talent has rejected if they happen to resemble(nobody here has seen their doppelganger before? How unique is a person? 1 in 5 million? Then there are 36 million of that type in just the United States alone). Perhaps it's time to re-evaluate some of the rules in society. It's a healthy thing to do periodically.
[go to top]