zlacker

They make no representation that it is her voice, and there's a really good chance that they separately made a voice that sounds similar enough to where if they could tack her name to it, it'd be good for advertising, but otherwise isn't her voice.

Voices are really hard for people to distinguish as being a certain person without priming, so really she's doing for free the advertising they were hoping she'd do for pay

>>8note+(OP)
> there's a really good chance that they separately made a voice that sounds similar enough to where if they could tack her name to it, it'd be good for advertising, but otherwise isn't her voice.

There’s also a really good chance this is in some way a deepfake. Would be interesting to see this get examined by courts.

>>8note+(OP)
I don’t know if it’s actually her voice. At this point I wouldn’t put it past them.

But if they concocted a fake voice to sound as much like her as possible, that’s not really better.

Altman’s tweet, combined with previous statements Her is his favorite movie, and trying to secure rights twice looks really really damning.

> so really she's doing for free the advertising they were hoping she'd do for pay

They didn’t want her to advertise for them. They wanted to use her voice. Do you not see a difference?