zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. ecjhdn+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-21 01:08:35
It pains me to say it, but I really think it pays dividends to consider the very obvious possibility that the people who are doing this are in general just not socially well-adjusted.

Everything about OpenAI speaks of people who do not put great value on shared human connections, no?

Hey, I like that artist. I am going to train a computer to produce nearly identical work as if by them so I can have as many as I like, to meet my own wishes.

Why is it surprising that it didn't really cross their mind that a virtual girlfriend is not a good look?

This is not an organisation that has the feelings of people central to its mission. It's almost definitionally the opposite.

replies(1): >>zarmin+u1
2. zarmin+u1[view] [source] 2024-05-21 01:21:52
>>ecjhdn+(OP)
Yes, it seEms a LOt of big Names in tech have this same problem. Curious that, isn't it?

I also think it is tipping their hand a bit. I know companies can do multiple things at once, but what might this flirty assistant focus suggest about how AGI is coming along?

replies(1): >>AutoDu+Nl1
◧◩
3. AutoDu+Nl1[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-21 13:13:11
>>zarmin+u1
Perhaps it is stumbling over the question of whether its creators are good people.
[go to top]