zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. whynot+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-21 01:05:00
Sounds like one of those situations you'd have to prove intent.

(and given the timeline ScarJo laid out in her Twitter feed, I'd be inclined to vote to convict at the present moment)

replies(2): >>sangno+G4 >>jahews+pk
2. sangno+G4[view] [source] 2024-05-21 01:45:15
>>whynot+(OP)
> Sounds like one of those situations you'd have to prove intent.

The discovery process may help figuring the intent - especially any internal communication before and after the two(!) failed attempts to get her sign-off, as well as any notes shared with the people responsible for casting.

3. jahews+pk[view] [source] 2024-05-21 04:25:52
>>whynot+(OP)
Not necessarily, because this would be a civil matter, the burden of proof is a preponderance of the evidence - it’s glaring obvious that this voice is emulating the movie Her and I suspect it wouldn’t be hard to convince a jury.
[go to top]