zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. spuz+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-21 00:21:35
The damning part is that they tried to contact her and get her to reconsider their offer only 2 days before the model was demoed. That tells you that at the very least they either felt a moral or legal obligation to get her to agree with their release of the model.
replies(1): >>Increa+B
2. Increa+B[view] [source] 2024-05-21 00:25:01
>>spuz+(OP)
Or, they wanted to be able to say, yes, that is "her" talking to you.

I have no idea if they really used her voice, or it is a voice that just sounds like her to some. I'm just saying openai's behavior isn't a smoking gun.

replies(1): >>johnny+pE
◧◩
3. johnny+pE[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-21 06:45:24
>>Increa+B
> a reference to an object or fact that serves as conclusive evidence of a crime or similar act, just short of being caught in flagrante delicto.

If this isn't a smoking gun, I don't know what it.

I think people forget the last part of the definition, though. A Smoking gun is about as close as you get without having objective, non-doctored footage of the act. There's a small chance the gun is a red herring, but it's still suspicious.

[go to top]