zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. keepam+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-20 23:03:03
Fair enough. But I think your comment was reductive…

but it doesn’t matter, because how he may have marketed it in a 140 character tweet does not encompass the entirety of how it could be used, of course

replies(1): >>CRConr+bZv
◧
2. CRConr+bZv[view] [source] 2024-06-01 10:52:14
>>keepam+(OP)
> But I think your comment was reductive…

So what? Reducing a situation to its essentials is an entirely valid argument / debating technique.

replies(1): >>keepam+LWx
◧◩
3. keepam+LWx[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-06-02 07:22:42
>>CRConr+bZv
Your mistake is thinking that's the essentials hahaha! :)
replies(1): >>CRConr+5lD
◧◩◪
4. CRConr+5lD[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-06-04 10:42:35
>>keepam+LWx
Oh ferfuxxake, please stop it with the Valley Girl talk.

lol hahaha!

[go to top]