zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. endisn+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-20 22:41:10
Sadly not much will come of this. Even if they’re fined, so what?
replies(3): >>MrSkel+k1 >>fullsh+S5 >>polyno+D8
◧
2. MrSkel+k1[view] [source] 2024-05-20 22:47:47
>>endisn+(OP)
You have no idea. Th will settle or be forced to admit they used a movie studios IP without payment to clone a voice model. They will cut a check for tens of millions and maybe stock as well. They will run from this as is clearly obvious from the immediate takedown. They are in crisis mode.
replies(1): >>astran+K3
◧◩
3. astran+K3[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-20 23:00:55
>>MrSkel+k1
Who says creating a voice model from a movie would require you to pay anyone?
replies(1): >>ranger+We
◧
4. fullsh+S5[view] [source] 2024-05-20 23:11:34
>>endisn+(OP)
I don't agree, if Johansson is serious about wanting a legal precedent set and doesn't care about the money (tbd) then a hypothetical lawsuit could go to the US Supreme court and lead to a decision that has significant ramifications.
replies(1): >>bigiai+he
◧
5. polyno+D8[view] [source] 2024-05-20 23:28:14
>>endisn+(OP)
Exactly, cost of doing business.
◧◩
6. bigiai+he[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-21 00:02:16
>>fullsh+S5
"US Supreme court"

Yeah. _That_ well known completely rational and unquestionably incorruptible institution.

I would bet Altman had been to more teenage sex parties and paid for more holidays with SC judges that Scarlett has... :sigh:

◧◩◪
7. ranger+We[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-21 00:06:18
>>astran+K3
I'd say it's a given, every detail in a movie is an artistic expression of some kind.
[go to top]