zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. iLoveO+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-20 09:16:28
> A gender-neutral voice would have just avoided annoying a certain percentage of the population, including me.

How do you manage to be annoyed when they offer both male and female voices?

I think you're the problem here buddy.

replies(1): >>thomas+mD
2. thomas+mD[view] [source] 2024-05-20 14:46:35
>>iLoveO+(OP)
I was referring to the default being a sexy female. Maybe it makes sense because the majority of users are male but I guess that's what I'd like to see change.
replies(1): >>iLoveO+aK
◧◩
3. iLoveO+aK[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-20 15:21:10
>>thomas+mD
I recommend you actually try it. While it sounded like this in the demo, it's not actually the default in the app.

The default sounds gender-neutral to me, or at least not very feminine, and it matches your tone, so it's "sexy" if you're being "sexy".

That said I think we all agree the demo was awful.

replies(1): >>thomas+A71
◧◩◪
4. thomas+A71[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-20 17:40:55
>>iLoveO+aK
Totally. I may have gone a bit far in my wording, but what irritated me was the cringy demos, not the actual app.

I basically spend more time talking to ChatGPT than humans these days when I'm not on holiday. I'm in no way opposed to it.

I don't know why, but I always end up going down the devil's advocate route without even realizing it. And then I find myself arguing positions that I don't even agree with. But it's interesting.

[go to top]