zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. watwut+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-18 09:38:21
> Even acknowledging that the NDA exists is a violation of it.

This should not be legal.

replies(1): >>Tao330+MI
2. Tao330+MI[view] [source] 2024-05-18 17:11:54
>>watwut+(OP)
It doesn't even make logical sense. If someone asks you about the NDA what are you supposed to say? "I can neither confirm nor deny the existence of said NDA" is pretty much confirmation of the NDA!
replies(1): >>space_+gl5
◧◩
3. space_+gl5[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-20 18:01:43
>>Tao330+MI
Yeah... Come up with "I’m committed to maintaining confidentiality in all my professional dealings." But still it sounds suspicious
[go to top]