zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. fragme+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-18 05:36:20
I wouldn't know, I'm not a billionaire. But when you hear about Amazon warehouse workers peeing into bottles because they they don't have long enough bathroom breaks, or Walmart workers not having healthcare because they're intentionally scheduled for 39.5 hours, it's hard to see that anyone could get to a billion without screwing someone over. But like I said, I'm not a billionaire.
replies(1): >>whimsi+D31
2. whimsi+D31[view] [source] 2024-05-18 18:00:00
>>fragme+(OP)
Who did JK Rowling screw? (putting aside her recent social issues after she already became a billionaire)

Having these discussions in this current cultural moment is difficult. I'm no lover of billionaires, but to say that every billionaire screwed people over relies on esoteric interpretations of value and who produces it. These interpretations (like the labor-theory of value) are alien to the vast majority of people.

replies(1): >>fragme+4S1
◧◩
3. fragme+4S1[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-19 02:58:07
>>whimsi+D31
aside from the way she's terrible, she's not terrible?

the wonderful thing any capitalism is that you can absolve yourself of guilt by having someone else do your dirty work for you. are you so sure every single seamstress that made clothes and stuffed animals, and the workers at the toy factories, and every single person involved with the making of the movies for the Harry Potter deals she licensed her work to were well compensated and treated well? that's not directly on her, but at least some of her money comes from there

replies(1): >>comput+ja3
◧◩◪
4. comput+ja3[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-19 18:35:23
>>fragme+4S1
How is JK Rowling terrible, exactly?
replies(1): >>fragme+M96
◧◩◪◨
5. fragme+M96[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-20 21:01:12
>>comput+ja3
I was referring to the parenthetical
[go to top]