zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. static+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-18 05:34:31
No it’s either a violation of the NLRB rule against severance agreements conditioned on non-disparagement or it’s a violation of the common law rule requiring consideration for amendments to service contracts.
replies(1): >>solida+s2
◧
2. solida+s2[view] [source] 2024-05-18 06:13:44
>>static+(OP)
> NLRB rule against severance agreements conditioned on non-disparagement

Wait that's a thing? Can you give more detail about this/what to look into to learn more?

replies(1): >>throwu+Hh
◧◩
3. throwu+Hh[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-18 10:11:13
>>solida+s2
https://www.nlrb.gov/news-outreach/news-story/board-rules-th...

It’s a recent ruling.

replies(1): >>wahnfr+cM
◧◩◪
4. wahnfr+cM[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-18 15:07:58
>>throwu+Hh
Tech execs are lobbying to dissolve NLRB now btw

They have a lot of supporters here (workers supporting their rulers interests)

[go to top]