zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. daniel+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-18 04:18:50
This is common, and there is nothing wrong with it.
replies(1): >>Chinju+wH
2. Chinju+wH[view] [source] 2024-05-18 13:54:59
>>daniel+(OP)
There is absolutely something wrong with it. Just because a thing is common doesn't make it good.
replies(1): >>daniel+8d1
◧◩
3. daniel+8d1[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-18 18:44:39
>>Chinju+wH
Two people entering an agreement to not talk about something is fine. You and I should (and can, with very few restrictions) be able to agree that I'll do x, and you'll do y and we are going to keep the matter private. Anyone who wants to take away this ability for two people to do such a thing needs to take a long hard look at themselves, and maybe move to north korea.
replies(1): >>hnfong+0N2
◧◩◪
4. hnfong+0N2[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-19 14:18:11
>>daniel+8d1
There are things that are legal between parties of (presumed) equal footing, that aren't legal between employers and employees.

That's why you can pay $1 to buy a gadget made in some third world country, but you can't pay your employees less than say $8/hour due to minimum wage laws.

replies(1): >>daniel+qh3
◧◩◪◨
5. daniel+qh3[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-19 19:04:08
>>hnfong+0N2
Yes, as noted there are a few exceptions.

Being paid a whole lot of money to not talk about something isn't remotely similar to paying someone a few dollars an hour. It's not morally similar, it's not legally similar and it's not treated similarly by anyone who deals with these matters and has a clue what they are doing.

[go to top]