zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. nickff+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-18 02:26:02
This doesn’t seem to fall inside the scope of that act, according to the link you cited:

>” The Silenced No More Act bans confidentiality provisions in settlement agreements relating to the disclosure of underlying factual information relating to any type of harassment, discrimination or retaliation at work”

replies(1): >>bernie+L
2. bernie+L[view] [source] 2024-05-18 02:36:41
>>nickff+(OP)
Sounds like retaliation to me.
replies(1): >>Fillig+S1
◧◩
3. Fillig+S1[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-18 03:00:00
>>bernie+L
It's not retaliation at work if you're no longer working for them.
replies(1): >>sudosy+44
◧◩◪
4. sudosy+44[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-18 03:45:27
>>Fillig+S1
The retaliation would be for the reaction to the board coup, no?
[go to top]