zlacker

we should all thank G-d similar people have been generally in charge of bioengineering and nuclear development labs else we'd have... err nothing. We'd have pretty much nothing at all.

>>llamai+(OP)
nukes are an excellent example, actually! for how many years did the US maintain its monopoly on nuclear weapons, pray tell?

>>123yaw+S2
Well nukes continue to be very difficult to download off the Internet or to rent access to via a web browser.

I haven't seen anyone advocate that the US government needs to be the only entity able to use AI, but if you have, you knocked their socks off with that one.

>>llamai+C6
>Well nukes continue to be very difficult to download off the Internet or to rent access to via a web browser.

well, the amount of damage you can inflict with an AI model is a few magnitudes lower than that of a nuclear weapon.

>I haven't seen anyone advocate that the US government needs to be the only entity able to use AI, but if you have, you knocked their socks off with that one.

did you miss Sam Altman's world tour last year, talking to the politicians about the ooooh so scary AI being developed by their unregulated competitors? the establishment of oversight committees and regulatory bodies in the US, from where corporate sockpuppets will presume to dictate the the terms of development and application of this technology?

>>llamai+(OP)
No, we only have roughly 70,000 nuclear bombs and no widespread nuclear energy. Not quiet the worst outcome but pretty close.

>>brigad+Vf
That is nowhere close to the worst outcome

>>llamai+dr
Just wait for a few more climate catastrophes